Executive Summary

This benchmark compares double-twist and triple-twist LAN pair machines under matched lay/back-twist conditions. Triple twist delivers +20% throughput ഒപ്പം +3 dB NEXT margin while reducing scrap by 30%. Dataset (CSV) and methods (PDF) are provided for replication.

Methods

Equipment: HK-DT-800 (double), HK-TT-500 (triple); calibrated NEXT analyzer.
Cable: Cat6 UTP pairs, 24 AWG; lay 12 mm; back-twist 100%.
Repeats: 20 per machine type.
Metrics: Throughput (pairs/min), NEXT margin (dB), lay stability, scrap rate.

ഫലങ്ങൾ

Machine Type	Throughput (pairs/min)	NEXT Margin (dB)	Scrap (%)
Double Twist	150 ± 2	39.2 ± 0.5	1.8
Triple Twist	180 ± 3	42.5 ± 0.6	1.2

Downloads

Download CSV Download Methods PDF

How to Cite

APA
Hongkai (2025). LAN Pair Twisting Benchmark v1: Triple vs Double. Zenodo. https://doi.org/pending

BibTeX

@dataset{hongkai_2025_lan_twist_benchmark,
  author    = {Hongkai Cable Machinery},
  title     = {LAN Pair Twisting Benchmark v1: Triple vs Double},
  year      = {2025},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi       = {pending},
  url       = {https://doi.org/pending},
  version   = {v1.0}
}

Copy BibTeX

Related Research

Loose-Tube SZ Pitch Study v1 – Dataset linking SZ pitch to optical attenuation and fill uniformity.
Fiber-Optic Line Cost Model v1 – Itemized production cost model with TCO and payback analysis.

LAN Pair Twisting Benchmark v1: Triple vs Double